Ableton - Push 2 "GROOVEBOX MODE" a la Elektron

Hey synth psychologists and psychiatrists, need your consultation and advice on my hopeless case.

Usually I use Ableton as a recorder / DAW for my external gear and just finalize my tracks there, so I don’t compose electronic music inside Live, and don’t perform live with it, at least the way I’d like it. Yeah, maybe when it’s something more traditional and has to deal with orchestration, heavy sample based instruments, some complicated arrangements like movie / theater stuff I use Ableton as a midi sequencer. But again - it’s more about finalizing tracks and not performing live with it.

Yeah I did tons of performances with computer on stage, but they weren’t completely “live” - they were mostly just prepared scenes played one after another in a “dj manner”, so for me such a method lacks the “emotional connection”, limits improvisation aspects, basically I can call such a workflow uninspiring.

And I know Ableton quite well, use it since 2005… So it’s not the problem of app knowledge, maybe just lack of inspiration when I look at the screen, but first of all lack of control and interface. So I managed to get Push 2, but the problem is still there - the combo still feels super slow, uninspiring and useless for my workflow.

At the same time, for example with a very basic Digitakt sampler I can do amazing things very fast, inspire myself with the workflow and program and perform complete live sets with it (plus analog mixer / efx / analog bassline ), despite it has a very limited memory, only 8 tracks, just 2 master effects…

So I decided to analyze what’s missing with Live / Push combo comparing it to Elektron workflow, and try to emulate those things and build a Groovebox in Ableton, something which I really can play Live.

So, I would appreciate if you help me to set it up and find my way as Ableton performer : )

  1. I want to have one Live project for the whole set, and I want all channels to be the same “style”. For real time improvisation and performance it’s really important to have that “closed eyes” mode, where every sound has exactly same control, so you know all the buttons positions and just do it as soon as you got the intention, without thinking “how I do that”.

So, it should be Simpler on each channel or maybe a Drum Rack? And what’s the way to switch between “songs”? Is where a way to assign completely new settings for any particular scene? Inside Simpler it’s possible to add a lot of sound into zones and use just one instance.

Another idea is to make a group on each channel with many layers, one for each song with dedicated instrument, but it’s really easy to get lost, especially if you have like 16 songs or more.

Yeah, maybe the way is to make each “song” on separate tracks like 1-8 , 9 -16 etc…
But it’s a little bit distracting…

Maybe there’s another better aproach?

  1. Ability to control “all the stuff” at once with one knob, like control decays or filter cutoff of all sounds at once (like you do it on DT - track + parameter ). And after I messed up everything, I want to get back to the initial / saved state.

  2. Ability to mute things fast and easy. With push 2 it’s nearly impossible to mute more than 2 - 3 channels at once, buttons are too tight and “special”.

So is there a way to assign mutes to the pads? Something like “HOLD MUTE button + PAD on the corresponding track” would be awesome.

At the same time, maybe the key here is to use just one track, put a drum rack on it and put a simpler into each slot. Not sure if it will work as well as I imagine it now.

  1. Ability to have “sound per step” option as in DT, and write automations + trig conditions / probability. Seems like this is not difficult with Push / Live 11, however maybe there are some trix to make it even more hands on?

I can continue further but let’s see what you can suggest…

Maybe there’s a good tutorial on this?
Maybe there are complete GROVEBOXES build with M4L for such a task?
Maybe I should try Bitwig? : )

As always any advice is welcome…

Have you looked at the Akai APC 40 MK2 - much more suited for live performance than Push, IMO.

3 Likes

No, will take a look. Thanks!

Also I think Push 1 was just a bit better for this (better buttons, more instant reaction ).

But besides controller itself, I think it’s a matter of the set organization, so I’m curious how others organize their things…

1 Like

Might want to look into clyphx pro. It’s a bit of a headscratcher, but you can customize your workflow in a million ways with it.

2 Likes

Bear in mind that I’m coming from a perspective of someone who has never used Ableton at all, but has tried a lot to make Bitwig as groovebox-y as possible. See related image!

My understanding is that the DrivenByMoss controller scripts model much of their behavior based on the behavior of the Push 2. Bitwig also has a pretty robust touch interface.

In the long term, I haven’t found the “DAW as groovebox” concept particularly workable as a groovebox. Instead, it mostly feels like a DAW with a nice controller. Doing things with the mouse in a DAW is always faster. I’ve enjoyed sequencing drums using the launchpad with Bitwig, but when it comes to more complex operations (slicing samples, adjusting parameters, routing signals, etc. I always reach for the mouse. I’ve tried really hard not to, but the interface is built for mouse-first. As a result I ended up swapping the pictured setup above for a proper laptop. I still love using a grid-based instrument as my primary midi controller. I like having the option to do a lot of limited DAW control with it, certainly

I guess my big point is this:

I don’t believe that any DAW will ever have that same experience you get with a groovebox.

Several months ago, I bought a Synthstrom Deluge, which is an interesting case because it comes from the other end - it’s a groovebox that tries to be a DAW. The differences in piano roll input, signal routing, modulation, and other complex input scenarios are huge.

I’m not at all trying to discourage you, but I’d like to at least encourage you to look on the other side of the aisle. Do you feel like getting a Push 2 will be able to make Ableton grooveboxy enough for you? Or would a device like Maschine+, MPC Live, or Deluge give you some of that DAW-like power, but still keep the fundamental form of a groovebox?

1 Like

Thanks for sharing your thoughts, and I agree - DAW hardly can provide experience close to a “real instrument”, since it was designed for screen / mouse - not the best interface for music making.

It’s the question of control / interface of course.

I like what Robert Henke did with his Monodeck II back in the dayz.

Despite it’s same Push conception, it’s million miles ahead of it > first of all the controls (master efx / eqs / send efx / synth parameters / clip grid ) are independent and immediately accessible, second the buttons and knobs itself are much better made - instant click > result… that’s it.

My “problem” is that I already have Push 2 (was Push 1 and then 2 user since they showed up ), and since a few years I really want to love and use them, but… I’m coming to the idea that despite it’s quite nice, it’s nowhere close to the “speed”, “instant control” of my Elektron machines, or for example my old Roland 303/808/909 etc… When I use them on stage I really can “perform” music, interact with the audience in “real time”, change my plan instantly, tune and shape the sound instantly (with analog mixer and a few pedals ) and it always sounds good.

With Push / Live it’s more like showing “prepared” records to the audience, super boring first of all for me the as a performer, second - if something sounds not right, you hardly will change or tweak it.

But I really believe it’s just me (I started to make electronic music with analog hardware ), so I’m again looking for more thoughts and ideas on this… Live has such an insane functionality it I think again it’s just a matter of finding right control.

Yeah… I know about it but a bit afraid to start learning it since it’s a bit “programmer stuff” and I’m a bit bad in things like that… I had another script from this guy back in the dayz from Push 1… NativeKontrol… I forgot the name of the script… So I was a bit disappointed after he decided not to update it for Push 2 (after I update the controller ) and offered no upgrade options… so I left this idea…

Maybe I should look again and maybe try to set it up… slowly…

I believe more than 1 controller needed for real experience. Probably Push for clip launching and real time sequencing. Another controller for “mixer” / “efx parameters” / “sends”. I already have small Korg NanoStudio. I believe I used for video editing apps. And another controller for synth / drum machine paramenters. I think I also had old small Novation with 32 knobs and 16 buttons…
So as soon as all the knobs are in front of eyes, maybe it will start to be more useful…

:woozy_face:

Totally! I think Push has way more control in that sense. The virtual faders in Bitwig’s script aren’t really a substitute.

I never tried push( in general and with bitwig), was closer to get akai apc40 , couln‘t decide yet…
But what got me close to get push 2 was when i saw the view where you can kinda plock a sequencer trig on one half of push and put in the note on the other half , a bit similar to a4.
A4 with the mini keyboard to me is somehow the perfect open concept what you can do and see with 4 tracks, of course then missing the effects and overview etc of a daw.
I‘m not sure or up to date, i think with apc40 2 on bitwig ( im sure also live) you can plock velocity, maybe a few things more.

I don’t know… Push seems so slooow, unresponsive…

I’ve seen a guy playing from bitwig tonight in the club, without any controller or anything just laptop… he sounded very good, at the same time after the set we talked and he told me his set was super boring and he was “bored”, but funny thing it wasn’t boring at all, so it just an illusion… the question is if “we” want to entertain ourselves or the audience?

1 Like

By the way… I find this mister’s push tutorials have sense: https://m.youtube.com/c/Belibat/videos

Hey! :slight_smile:
Thanks for mentioning my channel, not the first time here on Elektronauts :wink:
I think you can definitely start using Push 2 as a groovebox using this approach:

  • think about every song as a different Drum Rack, so put any samples, instruments and whatever in that drum rack pads
  • for each track/drum rack select up to 8 performance parameters, these could be filter cutoffs, effects dry/wet and everything that helps you to create transitions and variations in that track. Then map those parameters to the 8 rack macro knobs (to control them from push 8 knobs)
  • use the performance techniques explained in this tutorial https://youtu.be/Z8XU3HRSUgI
    especially when it talks about sequencing non playing patterns and progressive arrangement
  • if you still need more control over your performance you can implement ClyphX Pro (not available yet on Live 11) and the Push Hacker Max Device by Soundmanufacture check out this tutorial about how to implement them in a performative situation https://youtu.be/xi7mHi1aMus

Hope this can help. I think what you want to do is perfectly achievable, you just need to find the right workflow and, of course, you need to take some time to setup your projects before starting to perform.
Cheers everyone and keep making music!

Belibat

3 Likes