I sold some of my gear and now have enough cash to buy a used A4 MKI.
When I watched Cuckoo’s comparison between the MKI and MKII he noticed a slighty different low register, a ‘more mature’ overdrive and more outs at the back and cv-in for pedals on the MKII.
Altogether not the killer packet that makes me want to splash out 450 euro’s extra for a MKII.
But am I missing important stuff that could eventually change my mind? I would really like some advice on that, especially from people who own (or have owned) both A4 MKI and MKII.
Apart from the features you mentioned, MK II offers a few more buttons, individual outs, and full overbridge audio streaming. From what I understand, the MKI can only run a certain number of tracks, but MKII can run it all.
Little bit off topic, but with carefull research for a nice second hand, You can have 2 A4 mki for the price of 1 mkii. If there’s elektronauts that have 2 A4, maybe they can tell you the benefit of that configuration.
If that can help to decide
Thx for all the replies, folks. Don’t care much for the many outs on MKII, because eventually I am gonna finish tracks in Ableton (with Overbridge). I haven’t seen MKII’s in the Netherlands below 900€, while I saw MKI’s for as low as 600. With such a big purchase, I prefer to try out first, so bargain-searching elsewhere in the world is a bit of a no go.
Okay, thx!
Well, I have been waiting for Overbridge (Digitakt) forever, so a few weeks extra I will be able to survive. But in a youtube vid I saw someone feeding the 4 separate A4 tracks into Live and even with a separate track for fx. That would be more than enough for me.
I’d go mk I if I were you. The change in sound in the mk II is not a huge one, the mk I still sounds plenty usable and I much prefer the mk I form factor.
I know these things are subjective and opinions differ from person to person, but IMO only the OT mk II (better input section) and the rytm mk II (sampling and internal resampling) boxes are significant stepups from the mk I models. I myself have only ugraded the OT to mk II as I am ok with using my rytm without being able to sample (although resampling would be great).
Not for me, the new input section was the only thing keeping me from getting rid of my OT. I never used my OT for anything other than MIDI sequencing because of not being able to get satisfactory results wrt inout handling (partly me not knowing you can redline the inouts but also partly because the input section of the mk I is/was weird).
Well I upgraded and am very happy i did. Much better screen, layout and individual outs (which i use for fx pedals). To be honest the synth sound was never a factor, just did it for comfort and fx variety.
I noticed this difference between my AK and A4mk1, but it was easily matched through very subtle tweaking of my mixer EQ.
The same may me possible between the A4mk2 and 1?
Depends on the Sounds. The MK2 has more clarity in the Higher registers and of course Overdrive is different. The least one can be achieve with Analog Heat? I guess.