Will people stop making music if AI becomes superior in music making?

speak for yourself, I prefer to bury my recordings deep under the ocean where no-one will ever hear them.

1 Like

I didn’t like the offhanded remark about sampling either, or that the beginning of the downfall of the industry was the introduction of roger linn drum machines. what utter horseshit. if you can’t add more value as a drummer to a practical / commercial recording than a sample or a drum machine can, then perhaps you should reevaluate your choice to try and make a living exclusively off being a musician.

Maybe it’s just that for my entire life, there is no real security given or implied in a choice to be a musician (in any capacity), but the implication that the valuable role of the guy who picks up the tour van being eliminated is an indication of the decline of western society just doesn’t resonate with me.

1 Like

Agreed wholeheartedly. I don’t know who either of these dudes is, but it really reeks of ā€œback in my day things were better.ā€ I could rant about a few more other aspects of the conversation, but I’ll save that to keep from going further off-topic.

Connecting this again to the topic at hand, I realize I’m guilty of kind of doing the ā€œback in my dayā€/ alarmist thing in regards to AI, just like the dudes in the video did about sampling and efficiency. I’m terrified it will replace me and my coworkers, displace me professionally, and force me to reskill and it’s a topic I think about frequently. This merges with my extreme pessimism toward large companies as a whole, and the music industry especially.

1 Like

…it will lead to new labeling…made in usa/germany/china like…

once ai is all over the place and everywhere, actual ruling comes finally into place, so all ai generated stuff, no matter what, will be labeled as such…
and with everything else, people will make a difference, to prefer the ā€œreal thingā€, no matter, or even just because of the fact, that ai generated stuff might be just to ā€œperfectā€ while all sorts of human flaws are the next big sexy…

which is just bad news for all sorts of electronic music, i’m afraid… :wink:
synthesized styles were the sound of the future in quite a while now…but once the future is the new normal, it’s time to get ur hands dirty with drums and guitars and what not again…
mainstream keeps always changing…that’s a neverchanging law…
and so is that subculture/underground thing…once ai is everything, the need for making a difference will become stronger than ever before…

in the meantime, sure, everybody who still loves to create music but also want to make a living from it, might also use virtual helping hands, personal assistants to help them along the way…
there will be three different ways to judge on…those, totally man/handmade…those with a little help from llm`m/lam’s and the massive inflationary overflow of just ordered and prompted…

while on the naked commercial consumer content side, it will flip the coin in total…vast majority of sync license fees will become obsolete…too many content of all kind out there that simply does not need to pay for music rights made by humans anymore, just to have something that plays underneath in the background…

so let’s hope/pray/work/resist/vote as hard as we can for labeling…clear verification what’s generated and what’s NOT…for our own futures’ sake…the fight for the ā€œrightā€ or ā€œwrongā€ opinions, to win arguments in the age of information, this ugly new compulsion to choose for one side or the other and nothing left for the big inbetween, can only become a fair and human game again,or maybe even for the first time ever, if every automation processed thing is labeled…
this was a BOT…

1 Like

I guess going from A to B regardless of the outcome, whether good or bad. But anyway, ignore me. To each its own.

1 Like

I think people that listen to music seek out the human expression in whatever they’re hearing, so I think AI in music will never really surpass what humans create on it’s own because generally we relate to human made music more. The question of music still being made after AI is a bit silly because music is made for enjoyment not for competition and I think AI will, in fact, increase the amount of music being made in the future

1 Like

No your okay. I take your point.

What we have now are learning models. We call them AI, but people forget the A and focus on the I. It is artificial intelligence, as in ā€œnot realā€. It’s not real because it’s based on algorithms and learning from existing material.

Eventually there will be actual I - as in machines that have intelligence. At that point we are all either doomed to obsolescence or going to live a life of luxury where the machines sort shit out for us so we can just chill out.

In the meantime, AI can’t express experience, so music will still be ā€œbetterā€ if it’s produced by people expressing emotion. If anything, more value will be but on creativity, as it will be the only things that AI can’t do alone.

Either way, people will still make music. Always have, always will.

2 Likes

No

I disagree. AI stands for Artificial Industry.

3 Likes

I fully welcome our AI overloads and all they offer.

I’ll keep making my music and let them supply the masses with whatever it is the churn out.

It’s not the machine beating you at chess you need to worry about.

It’s the machine that lets you win at chess you need to fear.

11 Likes

Fuck never thought of it that way. Bastards been mocking me this whole time.

5 Likes

The rise in AI-assisted/generated art will create a counter-resurgence in music journalism and artist interviews.

Imagine reading or hearing someone like Billy Corgan, David Foster Wallace, Kate Bush, Trent Reznor, Sakamoto, Roy Lichtenstein, Wendy Carlos or Squarepusher explain why or how they made something, or what they felt when making it or conceiving it.

Then imagine an AI answering the same questions from an art or music interviewer. It would be laughable…because no matter how emotive they made themselves sound, we know that they do not suffer the ways humans do.

3 Likes

So far LLM-based AIs aren’t individual but general, meaning they don’t have the unique subjectivity which is necessary to artistic creation. That’s the difference from chess/go or even illustration or writing say marketing copy, imo, which are to some extent problems to be solved and more prone to being displaced by AI.

Creating individualised AIs for art is possible, but potentially hugely expensive - ChatGPT is the largest LLM out there and was enormously expensive to create, but still has ingested less data in an absolute sense than a small child would have - and it’s all in textual form. Video and audio data is more costly to process, and we’re not even really started on AI learning from embodied experiences, although it’s possible with advances in robotics I suppose.

Even once these problems are all solved, what most people really value in artistic experiences is some kind of connection to the creator, and it’s not clear they’d value that with AI. At least some people, I’d think, would always prefer human-made art. People care much more about that than technical accomplishment - you can see the evidence everywhere in all artistic genres.

2 Likes

Oh hey, look at me, giving up making music because some fucking robot is doing it. Yeah, that’s gonna happen.

5 Likes

I know it’s not directly related to the topic of the thread but it’s about AI so it’s close enough.
can someone ask ChumpGPT or whatever AI to make a playlist from the Current Sounds thread?

1 Like

Artists use the tools of their times. Not that I’m an artist. I do love making weird, fun music with Elektron boxes. It feels wonderful to be learning so much. I dont worry about being replaced by AI.

I’ll have to watch this. I’ve had the same thoughts.

There are plenty who are way too ā€œDoom and Gloomā€ about AI but also plenty who simply think it’s going to be a tool and everything will just get better.

I think it’s suddenly going to take one composer, sound designer, etc, to do the job of 10, which is kind of a game changing thing.

So sure it will be used as a tool but we are going to need drastically less people to operate these tools.

This won’t affect the big guys with name recognition or the small guys doing it for fun. But those trying the climb the latter and make a buck with some middle of the road work are going to have it rough, with a lot more competition than usual I think.

There will always be a place for true art, but so much of what we see and hear day to day occupies a sort of middle space that can be easily replaced.

It could lead to a renaissance of creativity for all I know.

My more optimistic take is that the bubble of ā€œmusicianā€ as a separate class of person who is ā€œgood at musicā€ will collapse and we’ll go back to banging on drums with the tribe together as a community event rather than it being based around the ego of a singular artist.

But you know, with synths.

4 Likes

I have no problem with people curating AI generated elements to include in a track but until AI knows what it’s like to be 3 E’s deep on a sweaty warehouse dancefloor at 7 in the morning it ain’t going to cut it for a lot of people.

6 Likes